HOME
PLAYLIST
THE QUIZ
COMMENTARY
LINKS
CONTACT
             
 
ARCHIVES
 

 

COMMENTARY >> RANTS

SING SONG

“ It’s The Singer Not the Song”, so goes the old Rolling Stones soul song, which may or may not be true, since we’ve all seen great vocalists lift mediocre material & mediocre vocalists lifted by a great song, but what is true is that most often it is not the person whose name is in capitals on the front cover of the record but the person in the fine print credited with the songwriting on the back cover who stands to make the most money from the song.

Every time the song is recorded or re-recorded, played on the radio, used in movies & commercials, the songwriter gets paid, not the original performer. Many people have gotten very rich wielding a pen rather than a musical instrument. In the 1950s the payola corruption scandal that rocked the music world was as a result of radio DJ Alan Freed being given writing credits on the B sides of people like Chuck Berry’s hits, the more airplay, the bigger the hit & more money for Freed.

In the past history of pop music, the songwriter wrote the song, the band played it & the singer sang it. Singers like Sinatra & Elvis drew upon the talents of a team of artisans who created the original material & finely honed it for them, “tin pan alley” as it came to be known. The Brill Building on Broadway housed songwriters like Lieber & Stoller, Goffin & King, David & Bacharach, Doc Pomus & Mort Shuman, Boyce & Hart amongst others who clocked in each morning to sit in offices & churn out the hits for others day after day, even Lou Reed & John Cale tried their hands at it. Some like Carole King, Neil Diamond, Billy Joel, Jim Webb & Paul Simon went on to become performers in their own right. Then there was Motown’s Holland, Dozier & King hit songwriting team, Willie Dixon had a modest solo career but it was people like Howlin’ Wolf, Chuck Berry, Muddy Waters, Bo Diddley & other blues greats recording & playing his songs that made his name & no doubt earned him more money than all of them put together.

Tailor made original songs & cover versions of other people’s songs made up the repertoire of the popular singers & bands of the day,
Songwriting was valued as a sophisticated skill & art, not everyone could do it. Even great originators like John Coltrane & Jimi Hendrix recorded cover versions like Hey Joe & Green sleeves, while The Beatles, the Rolling Stones & even Bob Dylan did not create all original albums until their 3rd or 4th record, they developed & honed their songwriting skills slowly while playing other people’s songs to pad out their performances & records until they were ready to write their own. Bands like Procol Harum & The Grateful Dead had one non-musician non-performing member as their lyricist, solely to supply the words for their original musical material. Singers & musicians did not consider themselves as automatically becoming songwriters; it took time, practice & talent to get good at it.

So here we are in an era when everyone’s a singer/songwriter with no warm up & doing cover versions is looked down upon as crass commercialism or somehow less than legitimate (with some notable exceptions). An explosion of self-expression. Greed? Perhaps, singing the song & owning the song certainly makes more money than singing someone else’s, but I think it’s actually something else. Conceit. Because someone has a good or at least interesting singing voice & may have practiced the mechanical skills of playing an instrument & mastered it, does that automatically mean that they have the craft to write a song or have something worthwhile & original to say in meaningful way? Of course not.

Everyone’s a poet these days or at least think that they are. Certainly there is always a percentage of the population that is multi talented, naturally gifted, geniuses or musical savants, but how does that account for this current explosion of self-sown songwriters? The democratisation of the process or the lowering of standards to the lowest common denominator? Like most paradoxes probably a little bit of both. Certainly it is easier for a record company to sign up someone who self sufficiently does it all, especially if they have a publishing arm that the performer can also be signed up to, less people & more potential earning for all. Canny veterans like Van Morrison & Bruce Springsteen still leaven their career with cover versions, Bob Dylan sat out the 90s only recording a covers album, they are wise enough to realise that their muse is not an inexhaustible resource.

Perhaps the new generation could learn from the masters, that song writing is a life long apprenticeship, that practice is part of the process, that not everyone is good at it & ask why settle for the mediocre when there is so much great material already written & waiting to be played.

 

back to top

 

THE SKULLCAVE FORUM