HOME
PLAYLIST
THE QUIZ
COMMENTARY
LINKS
CONTACT
             
 
ARCHIVES
 

 

COMMENTARY >> RANTS

THE CHARTS, NOT THE HEARTS AND MINDS

Have the Pop Charts ever been more irrelevant? Most of us can remember when the Number One single was omnipotent; booming out of lounge rooms, car radios, television sets, shops & noisy neighbour’s parties all around us, you knew what it was whether you wanted to or not. While “serious “ music lovers gravitated to the album format, there was a certain small victory in being able to assemble 4 minutes of music that could indelibly imprint itself on the psyche of millions regardless of it’s musical worth.

It was an odd notion; ranking music competitively like sport, based around a simple idea that benefited record shops, record companies & radio stations, that if you could find out what people wanted to hear & buy & give it to them over & over again, that everybody would be happy & make a profit. So there were retailers who were deemed to be “chart “ shops that each week would submit their sales figures & hence the chart was calculated, tightly playlisted - radio would air those records over & over while record companies knew which records to press up in big numbers & could use chart positions to publicise their products.

Even artists bought into it; The Beatles & The Rolling Stones checked with each other so that they didn’t compete with each other for the coveted spot & spaced their singles accordingly, more recently, Oasis & Blur did the opposite by releasing singles on the same day in a very public feud for the top spot (Oasis won). But now the music audience has fragmented, radio stations are audience targeted to particular demographs, music shops are high - sales, volume - discounted chains, downloads & MP3s elbow for space & there is no longer a centre, it has all devolved to the periphery. And sales figures confirm it. Recently in Australia a Number One single has been achievable with as little as 5000 sales in a week, by Number 20 on the chart it was less than 1000 copies & that’s in a country of over 20 million people!

Silverchair’s new single has sold more on downloads than retail through the shops, a sign of not only the future but the present demise of the single. This week, no major record company released a single in Australia & the largest retail chain, Sanity will soon be no longer be stocking singles at all.

But it’s not only the future of the single that is in jeopardy.
Silverchair’s recent album, their 5th to debut at Number One, breaking the record held by Midnight Oil, Cold Chisel & Jimmy Barnes, sold a healthy 35,000 copies in a week, but that was the total amount of all the other 9 albums in the Top Ten added together, while last week’s Number One album only had to sell 5000 copies to reach the zenith & the 20th best selling album moved under 2000 copies nationwide.

The dirty little secret of the way the charts are calculated is that they are based not on sales over the counter, but by orders by shops from the record companies. As a result, companies can create incentives like gifts & discounts for retailers to pre - order large quantities of discs regardless of actual consumer demand in order to create a false illusion of success on the charts. Perhaps that is why 3 months after the much touted chart success of Bob Dylan’s latest album I could pick it up for $10 in a large music retail outlet. So not only are the charts having less & less sales to calculate their results on, the very basis of their calculation is having less & less to do with actual consumer demand.

In a recent address to the SXSW convention David Byrne argued that digital download sales would overtake CD sales by 2012, similar to when cassette sales in the 80s were vanquished by the silver disc. Tried to buy a pre-recorded or even a blank cassette tape (or VHS) lately? This means that manufacturing & distribution costs will be virtually non -existent for record companies but he questioned whether the companies would adjust the current under $2 that most artists get per CD as a result of the those savings.

It’s only the very top echelon of artists that can currently make a living from record sales alone anyway. For most performers, CDs are break even or loss leaders that enable the performer to garner the publicity, interviews & air play that means they can continuously tour the world playing to the 1000 people or so that are their fan base in each of the cities that they visit. That generates the real income that performers can live off, not record sales. Even Byrne admitted that once music is dominated by digital downloads that sound quality will suffer, “ It doesn’t have to sound good to move people, “ he said, but will provide a boost for live music which where most performers need to generate income.

Strange to think that in the past that people went to live concerts wondering if the show would sound as good as the record, but in the future would know that it would have to sound better than the digital dross that they have to settle for otherwise.


 

 

back to top

 

THE SKULLCAVE FORUM