HOME
PLAYLIST
THE QUIZ
COMMENTARY
LINKS
CONTACT
             
 
ARCHIVES
 

 

COMMENTARY >> RANTS

NUMBER ONE WITHOUT A BULLET

Most of us these days can be ( thankfully ) oblivious to music sales charts, but a couple of interesting things have occurred recently that are worthy of note.

Pink Floyd’s 1973 album “ Dark Side Of The Moon “ has just notched up an incredible 1500 weeks in the American charts, far surpassing the previous 6 year record held by Carole King’s “Tapestry” album. About 8000 people a week in America alone go into record shops & buy a copy, every week. Technologically perched at the nexus of analogue & digital, it was the first CD released by EMI in 1984 & it has continued to etch itself into the communal mind ever since it’s release, none of it ever licenced for other commercial purposes. For many people the night that they first heard Dark Side Of The Moon in it’s entirety was like a rite of passage, a musical epiphany not just for it’s original generation but obviously for successive generations since, even if for longtermers, it remains one of those great record albums that you never really want to ever hear again. And it’s not even the band’s biggest seller, The Wall is tied with Led Zeppelin IV as the top selling album by a band ( I don’t count compilations ) of all time! So it’s no surprise that Roger Waters on his forthcoming tour will be performing the entire Dark Side Of The Moon, reclaiming it as his own. And who could blame him?

Pink Floyd spans a period too, when people bought many more records than they do now, when records that reached Number One were almost ubiquitous, you heard it everywhere, radio, television, shops, taxis, you couldn’t avoid it, like it or not. Remember Abba? It provided a momentary musical snapshot of the communal conciousness, a cultural zeitgeist to be inevitably replaced by yet another Number One.

But over the last decade or so the music market has become so fragmented & genrefied that there has ceased to be a dominant song or even style, it’s all devolved to the periphery, the core is gone. The niche market rules. For instance, The Grammy Awards now has over 30 award categories, magazines like Billboard has that many charts ( so if they have “Urban” charts why isn’t there a “Suburban” category ?). Music has become horizontal spread rather than an upward spiral. Perhaps that ‘s why in Australia recently, James Blunt only had to sell 7,000 copies in a week to get the Number One album slot, while The Youth Group grasped the coveted Number One single slot with only a mere 4,500 copies sold in a country of 20 million people. All of which is compounded by the format wars. Recently they changed the pop charts in Britain to include i Tunes downloads & thus we had the first Number One single “Crazy “ by hitherto unknown Gnarls Barkley with no retail sales, while the album went gold from downloads before it was released as a CD to retail. Phew! things are moving fast.

And speaking of speed, have you noticed how the punctuation of music has slowed? Aside from a couple of exceptions they just don’t release records nearly as often as they used to. The Beatles for instance released 23 singles, most not on album, 13 Eps & 12 Albums in less than 8 years. The Rolling Stones? 17 singles & 12 albums during the same period. The Doors? 6 albums in 4 years.

Get the picture? The rhythm of releases has slowed over the last 2 decades or so, now an album every year or 2 or even longer is all that’s expected in spite of demand, singles are merely advanced advertising for the forthcoming album length release rather than fleeting glimpses of the creative process & progress. A quick musical postcard. This slowed rhythm of releases also distorts the music, because of the long wait between records now, expectation can be raised to unrealistic proportions both in the artists & the audience. How can anyone ever live up to that? Each gesture becomes a bold disproportionate portentous statement before another lengthy silence, rather than an audiophonic progress report followed quickly by another progress report. The modern cycle of releases rather than reflecting creative evolution & progress becomes a series of statements of points reached not explored. There’s no sense of urgency, of revealing the process as much as the product. Bob Dylan’s accelerated creative evolution in the 60s & 70s can be charted on the albums of the time, “Bringing It All Back Home “, “Highway 61 Revisited” & the double “Blonde On Blonde”, all recorded & released in a 2 year period of here’s where he is at the moment, he’ll be somewhere else next time series of bulletins that are still invigorating in their urgency.

But it’s the demise of the pop charts as contemporary cultural meeting point that is most lacking in the current charts. The biggest Australian pop band of the 70s, Sherbet, notched up 20 consecutive hit singles, 17 albums including 10 platinum & 40 gold in their decade long career. Quite a work ethic. But they also had the advantage of a weekly TV show that provided the venue for this rapid fire release regimen, Countdown. Often damned, seldom praised, it provided an unrelenting forum for pop in Australia that has never been recreated. So it’s little wonder then that Sherbert have reformed to headline the forthcoming Countdown revival tour.

Can you imagine an Australian Idol reunion tour 30 years from now? I thought not. Or at least you don’t really want to.

 



 

back to top

 

THE SKULLCAVE FORUM